Tatum v. Galaza

Full title: ANTHONY TATUM, Petitioner, v. GEORGE M. GALAZA, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

CV 06-683 MMM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

ANTHONY TATUM, Petitioner, v. GEORGE M. GALAZA, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-683 MMM (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 29, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the SAP on the merits with prejudice.