From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate's, Inc. v. Little America Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Utah
Jul 13, 1976
551 P.2d 1257 (Utah 1976)

Opinion

No. 14415.

July 13, 1976.

Appeal from Third District Court, Salt Lake County; Hon. Gordon R. Hall, Judge.

Keith E. Sohm, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

James M. Richards, Richard L. Bird, Jr., of Richards, Bird Kump, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.


This case was here before ( 535 P.2d 1228). We reversed the judgment of the trial court which was based on an accord and satisfaction theory.

The court, on review, in accounting for any claims for damage or breach of contract came up with another judgment, that is now being attacked on appeal on the basis of insufficiency of the evidence. The evidence was somewhat controversial, but there appears to be sufficient competent, admissible evidence to support the second judgment of the trial court, and under familiar rules of review we are constrained to and do affirm the judgment in this case, the parties, by stipulation, having invited the trial court and us to conclude this case on such stipulated basis.


Summaries of

Tate's, Inc. v. Little America Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Utah
Jul 13, 1976
551 P.2d 1257 (Utah 1976)
Case details for

Tate's, Inc. v. Little America Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:TATE'S, INC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. LITTLE AMERICA REFINING CO., A…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jul 13, 1976

Citations

551 P.2d 1257 (Utah 1976)