From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. WM. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2023
1:23-cv-01038-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-01038-JLT-CDB

07-14-2023

LAKEMA TATE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. WM. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF NICK SUCIU III TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE (Doc. 4)

The Court has considered the application of Nick Suciu III, attorney for Plaintiffs Lakema Tate and Richard Ortiz, for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2). In light of the application and for good cause appearing Nick Suciu III's application for admission to practice pro hac vice is HEREBY GRANTED.

The pro hac vice attorney is DIRECTED to request filing access through PACER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tate v. WM. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2023
1:23-cv-01038-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Tate v. WM. Bolthouse Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAKEMA TATE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. WM. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-01038-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2023)