From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2011
Case No. SACV10-1998 JVS (CWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. SACV10-1998 JVS (CWx)

09-26-2011

TIMOTHY TATE, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., an entity formed unknown, and NDEX WEST LLC, a business organization formerly known, and Does 1 to 100, Defendants.

Submitted by: Douglas G. Matsui (#138239) ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN, LLP Attorneys for Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a Division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, formerly known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB and World Savings Bank, FSB Attorneys for Defendant


Submitted by:

Douglas G. Matsui (#138239)

ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN

CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a Division

of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, formerly known as

Wachovia Mortgage, FSB and

World Savings Bank, FSB

Attorneys for Defendant

Honorable James V. Selna

Courtroom 10 C


ORDER REGARDING MOTION BY DEFENDANT WACHOVIA MORTGAGE TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT


Date: September 26, 2011

Time: 1:30 PM.

Crtrm: 10C

The motion of Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a Division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., formerly known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, and World Savings Bank, FSB ("Wachovia" or "defendant"), under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for an order dismissing the second amended complaint of plaintiff TIMOTHY TATE ("plaintiff") came on regularly for hearing before the Court.

The Court, having read and considered the motion, the request for judicial notice, all opposition and reply papers, find and orders as follows:

Defendant Wachovia's Motion to Dismiss is granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant Wachovia's Motion to Dismiss is granted without leave to amend;

2. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

_______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

A.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459.

On August 22, 2011, I served the foregoing document described as:

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING MOTION BY DEFENDANT WACHOVIA

MORTGAGE TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

on all interested parties in said case addressed as follows:

Served Electronically via Court's CM/ECF System:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Joseph R. Manning, Jr., Esq.

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH R.

MANNING, JR.

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Counsel for NDeX West, LLC

Edward A. Treder, Esq.

BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER

TREDER & WEISS, LLP
[ X ] FEDERAL: I declare that I am employed in the offices of a member of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on August 22, 2011, at Pasadena, California.

Mark Betti

(Print Name)

_________________

(Signature of Declarant)


Summaries of

Tate v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2011
Case No. SACV10-1998 JVS (CWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Tate v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY TATE, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., an entity formed…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

Case No. SACV10-1998 JVS (CWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)