From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 25, 1971
437 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1971)

Summary

affirming dismissal under section 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), of complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Ferguson v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs.

Opinion

No. 25081.

January 25, 1971.

John Nash, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before ELY, CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


Following an administrative proceeding on appellant's claim for disability insurance benefits, appellant was notified of denial of his claim on July 19, 1968. The notice advised that he might obtain review of the order, pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), by filing a civil action against the Secretary in the district court, within 60 days from the date of notice.

Appellant commenced his action on September 19, 1968, two days late. The district court dismissed. We affirm.

The exclusive method for obtaining judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary is set forth in Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Under that Section:

(g) Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Secretary may allow. * * * [Emphasis supplied].

The district court was clearly correct in dismissing the action. A petition to review a decision of the Secretary must be brought within the statutory time limit. Jamieson v. Folsom (7 Cir. 1963) 311 F.2d 506, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied, 374 U.S. 487, 83 S.Ct. 1868, 10 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1963); Bomer v. Ribicoff (6 Cir. 1962) 304 F.2d 427; See, Johnson v. Flemming (10 Cir. 1959) 264 F.2d 322.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Tate v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 25, 1971
437 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1971)

affirming dismissal under section 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), of complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Ferguson v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs.

affirming dismissal of Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Williamson v. Saul

affirming dismissal of Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Del Rosario v. Berryhill

affirming dismissal of Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Williams v. Berryhill

affirming dismissal of action because it was filed two days late

Summary of this case from Grabowski v. Colvin

affirming dismissal where plaintiff filed two days late

Summary of this case from Vasquez v. Colvin

observing " petition to review a decision of the [Commissioner] must be brought within the statutory time limit," and affirming dismissal of a Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Moles v. Saul

observing " petition to review a decision of the [Commissioner] must be brought within the statutory time limit," and affirming the dismissal of a Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Nicholas C. v. Saul

observing " petition to review a decision of the [Commissioner] must be brought within the statutory time limit," and affirming the dismissal of a Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Ward v. Saul

observing " petition to review a decision of the [Commissioner] must be brought within the statutory time limit," and affirming the dismissal of a Social Security complaint filed two days late

Summary of this case from Williams v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Tate v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Harry J. TATE, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and United…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 1971

Citations

437 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

Edmond v. Colvin

"The exclusive method for obtaining judicial review of a final decision of the [Social Security…

Willis v. Weinberger

The exclusive nature of the procedures set out in Section 205(g) have been recognized on numerous occasions.…