From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Sweetie Pies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2014
No. 4:14-CV-1736-RLW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 15, 2014)

Opinion

No. 4:14-CV-1736-RLW

10-15-2014

VERONICA NICOLE TATE, Plaintiff, v. SWEETIE PIES, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. The motion will be denied.

There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases. Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8 Cir. 1984). In determining whether to appoint counsel, the Court considers several factors, including (1) whether the plaintiff has presented non-frivolous allegations supporting his or her prayer for relief; (2) whether the plaintiff will substantially benefit from the appointment of counsel; (3) whether there is a need to further investigate and present the facts related to the plaintiff's allegations; and (4) whether the factual and legal issues presented by the action are complex. See Johnson v. Williams, 788 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (8 Cir. 1986); Nelson, 728 F.2d at 1005.

After considering these factors, the Court finds that the facts and legal issues involved are not so complicated that the appointment of counsel is warranted at this time.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Dated this 15th day of October, 2014.

/s/_________

RONNIE L. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tate v. Sweetie Pies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2014
No. 4:14-CV-1736-RLW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Tate v. Sweetie Pies

Case Details

Full title:VERONICA NICOLE TATE, Plaintiff, v. SWEETIE PIES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

No. 4:14-CV-1736-RLW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 15, 2014)