Summary
In Tate v. Camp, supra, 147 Tenn. 137, 26 A.L.R. 755, it was held that a forfeiture provision in a will is not void as against public policy, but it was also held that an exception to the rule sustaining a forfeiture, should be made by the court, where the contest was prosecuted in good faith, and upon probable cause.
Summary of this case from In re Estate of James H. ChambersOpinion
NO. 144 WAL (2013)
2013-07-24
Amos Tate v. State Correctional Institution Camp Hill, Accounting Supervisor
No. 2154 CD 2012
Appeal from the Commonwealth Court.
Disposition: Denied.