From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2013
No. 61722 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61722

05-15-2013

BRANDIE MAY TATE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order revoking appellant Brandie Tate's participation in a diversion program and entering a judgment of conviction. Seventh Judicial District Court, White Pine County; Steve L. Dobrescu, Judge.

Tate argues that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a sentence of 12 to 36 months imprisonment because it did so based upon its erroneous belief that Tate had her children in the car when she was caught driving under the influence of marijuana and opioids. The record reflects that the district court revoked Tate's probation and imposed the sentence because she lied to the drug court. Because the record does not demonstrate that the district court relied "solely [upon] impalpable and highly suspect evidence," Denson u. State, 112 Nev. 489, 492, 915 P.2d 284, 286 (1996), and the sentence falls within the parameters provided by the relevant statute, see NRS 484C.400(l)(c), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

__________________________, J.

Gibbons
__________________________, J.
Douglas
__________________________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge

State Public Defender/Ely

State Public Defender/Carson City

Attorney General/Carson City

White Pine County District Attorney

White Pine County Clerk


Summaries of

Tate v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2013
No. 61722 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Tate v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRANDIE MAY TATE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 15, 2013

Citations

No. 61722 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)