Tate v. Sommerset

Full title: CLARENCE DEMETRIUS TATE, Plaintiff, v. SUE SOMMERSET, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Mar 22, 2011

ED CV 10-01561-AHM (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CLARENCE DEMETRIUS TATE, Plaintiff, v. SUE SOMMERSET, et al., Defendants. No. ED CV 10-01561-AHM (VBK) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. March 22, 2011

          ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) DISMISSING THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving and adopting the Report and Recommendation, and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Complaint, and the action, without prejudice.