From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Lincoln County Jail Staff

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Jul 8, 2009
4:09-cv-20 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 8, 2009)

Opinion

4:09-cv-20.

July 8, 2009


MEMORANDUM


In this civil rights action, the plaintiffs, who are represented by counsel, were ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of this court. [Court File No. 8]. Plaintiffs have failed to respond to the court's order within the time required. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of the court. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991); Carver v. Bunch, 946 F.2d 451 (6th Cir. 1991). The court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.


Summaries of

Tate v. Lincoln County Jail Staff

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Jul 8, 2009
4:09-cv-20 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Tate v. Lincoln County Jail Staff

Case Details

Full title:MIKE G. TATE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN COUNTY JAIL AND STAFF, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Jul 8, 2009

Citations

4:09-cv-20 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 8, 2009)