Tate v. Board of Prison Terms

Full title: CLARENCE DEMETRIUS TATE, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: May 13, 2010

CV 06-04505-AHM (VBK) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2010)

Opinion

CLARENCE DEMETRIUS TATE, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Defendant. No. CV 06-04505-AHM (VBK). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. May 13, 2010.

          ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Amended Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving and adopting the Amended Report and Recommendation, and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action, with prejudice.