From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tat Tohumculuk A. S. v. H.J. Heinz Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 6, 2013
Case 2:13-cv-00773-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013)

Opinion

          THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         STIPULATION

         Plaintiffs TAT Tohumculuk A.S. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants H.J. Heinz Company, L.P., sued erroneously as "H.J. Heinz Company" and HeinzSeed, an unincorporated division of H.J. Heinz Company, L.P. ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby submit, through their undersigned counsel of record, the following Stipulation and Proposed Order:

         WHEREAS, on April 22, 2013, this Court issued its Order Re: Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, which set the Status Conference in the above action for July 22, 2013 (Doc. No. 5);

         WHEREAS, on June 27, 2013, pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, the Court ordered the Status Conference continued to September 30, 2013 (Doc. No. 20);

         WHEREAS, on July 12, 2013, pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, the Court ordered the Status Conference continued to November 25, 2013 (Doc. No. 22);

         WHEREAS, on October 21, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 29), and has not yet ruled on Defendants' Motion;

          David S. Reidy (SBN 225904), Andrew Amoroso (SBN 274673), San Francisco, CA, Michael T. Scott, (admitted pro hac vice), REED SMITH LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Attorneys for Defendant, H.J. Heinz Company, L.P., sued erroneously as "H.J. Heinz Company" and HeinzSeed, an unincorporated division of H.J. Heinz Company, L.P.

          ANASTASSIOU & ASSOCIATES, Effie F. Anastassiou, Attorneys for Plaintiff, TAT TOHUMCULUK A.S.

          WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants and Plaintiff wish to stipulate to move the Status Conference hearing to a date after the Motion is decided;

          WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants and Plaintiff believe that good cause exists to continue the status conference in order to preserve the time and resources of the Court and the Parties;

          THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for Defendants and counsel for Plaintiff that:


• The Status Conference currently scheduled for November 25, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. is continued to a date after the Court rules on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.

         SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         Appearing that good cause exists pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status Conference currently scheduled for November 25, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. is continued to December 23, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 14th Floor. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than December 9, 2013.


Summaries of

Tat Tohumculuk A. S. v. H.J. Heinz Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 6, 2013
Case 2:13-cv-00773-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Tat Tohumculuk A. S. v. H.J. Heinz Co.

Case Details

Full title:TAT TOHUMCULUK A. S., a Turkish company, Plaintiff, v. H.J. HEINZ COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

Case 2:13-cv-00773-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013)