Opinion
No. 768 CA 21-01464
11-10-2022
MICHAEL J. TARSEL AND SUZANNE M. TARSEL, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES J. TROMBINO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
PULLANO & FARROW, ROCHESTER (MALLORY K. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (KAREN G. FELTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
PULLANO & FARROW, ROCHESTER (MALLORY K. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (KAREN G. FELTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., NEMOYER, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered September 30, 2021. The order, inter alia, ordered defendant to pay punitive damages to plaintiffs in an amount to be determined after discovery and a hearing.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.