From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TARRYTOWN, WP AND M. v. N.Y., W. AND CONN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1899
46 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Opinion

December Term, 1899.


We have recently decided, in the cases of Dusenberry and the Village of Bronxville against this defendant, that the duty lies on the railroad company of showing affirmatively that it has the necessary consents of property owners to constitute a valid franchise for the construction of its railroad in the street. The plaintiff in this case entirely fails to sustain that burden, and while it is true the defendant may have no right in the street, as on these papers the plaintiff appears equally without right, the latter is in no condition to ask for affirmative relief in its behalf. For this reason the order appealed from should be reversed and injunction dissolved, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event of the action. All concurred. (See Dusenberry v. New York, W. C. Traction Co., ante, p. 267; and Village of Bronxville v. New York, W. C. Traction Co., ante, p. 627.)


Summaries of

TARRYTOWN, WP AND M. v. N.Y., W. AND CONN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1899
46 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
Case details for

TARRYTOWN, WP AND M. v. N.Y., W. AND CONN

Case Details

Full title:Tarrytown, White Plains and Mamaroneck Railway Company, Respondent, v. New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1899

Citations

46 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)