From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Target Dev. v. Best Cty. Wide Const

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 23, 1984
457 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1499.

October 23, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis X. Knuck, J.

Siegfried, Kipnis Gross and Tom Hall, Miami, for appellant.

Ann Mason Parker, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.


In this action based on foreclosure of a mechanic's lien, the property owner appeals a judgment in favor of the lienholder. We reverse on authority of Boyce Construction Corp. v. District Board of Trustees of Valencia Community College, 414 So.2d 634 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), a case which is factually similar to this one.

As in Boyce, no evidence was presented to the trial court which could support a finding here that an unpleaded issue — quantum meruit — was tried by the express or implied consent of the property owner. Neither will we affirm the judgment on the alternative theory of substantial performance, because the trial court failed to expressly resolve that factual issue.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Target Dev. v. Best Cty. Wide Const

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 23, 1984
457 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Target Dev. v. Best Cty. Wide Const

Case Details

Full title:TARGET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. BEST…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 23, 1984

Citations

457 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Specialty Rest. v. Patterson Const

This action is based on damages allegedly suffered by D.K. Patterson Construction Company, Inc. (Patterson)…

Schipani v. Seagraves, Inc.

We hold that Seagraves could not plead that an express contract provided the basis for his foreclosure and…