From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tardif v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 7, 2021
13-CV-4056 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2021)

Opinion

13-CV-4056 (KMW)

06-07-2021

MARY M. TARDIF, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JOHN O'CONNELL, DEPUTY INSPECTOR DANIEL MULLIGAN, DEPUTY INSPECTOR EDWARD WINSKI, SERGEANT THOMAS MCMANUS, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, POLICE OFFICER JAMES MCNAMARA, POLICE OFFICER ALENA AMINOVA, POLICE OFFICER KENDAL CREER, POLICE OFFICER MARSHA RUMBLE, POLICE OFFICER FELIX SCHMIDT, JOHN DOE, NYPD OFFICERS #1-13, JOHN DOE, NYPD OFFICERS #1-11, JOHN DOE, NYPD OFFICERS #1-9, JOHN DOE, NYPD OFFICER #11, Defendants.


ORDER

KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge:

On June 4, 2021, the parties provided a status report, expressing divergent views as to how the case should proceed. (ECF No. 372.) Separately, Plaintiff filed a letter motion seeking a modification of an outdated Scheduling Order (ECF No. 40) in order to allow Plaintiff to serve supplemental expert reports in connection with Plaintiffs present medical condition. (ECF No. 273.) The existing Scheduling Order was issued by Magistrate Judge Maas, and required discovery to be complete by June 30, 2015. (See ECF No. 63.)

As set forth in the Court's May 4, 2021 Order (ECF No. 370), Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiffs motion by June 18, 2021. Plaintiff may file a reply by June 25, 2021.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tardif v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 7, 2021
13-CV-4056 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Tardif v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARY M. TARDIF, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 7, 2021

Citations

13-CV-4056 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2021)