From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarburton v. Hagemann

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1936
187 A. 749 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1936 —

Decided October 20, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the defendants-appellants, Ralph W. Wescott and Louis B. LeDuc.

For the plaintiff-respondent, French, Richards Bradley ( Floyd H. Bradley).


The proofs examined, it clearly appears that a factual question arose as to whether the plaintiff was an invitee at the time of his injuries. This factual question was submitted to the jury by the learned trial judge in a fair and well balanced charge. Timannus v. DeWitt, 109 N.J.L. 168 .

The judgment under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Tarburton v. Hagemann

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1936
187 A. 749 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Tarburton v. Hagemann

Case Details

Full title:ELMER E. TARBURTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALBERT C. HAGEMANN AND EDWARD…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 20, 1936

Citations

187 A. 749 (N.J. 1936)
187 A. 749