From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tapia v. Super Noriega, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2021
21-CV-8778 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-8778 (VSB)

12-06-2021

JUAN TAPIA et al. Plaintiffs, v. SUPER NORIEGA, LLC et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERIC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs commenced this Fair Labor Standards Act action on October 27, 2021. (Doc.1.) Based on the affidavits of service filed in this action, Defendants had until November 22, 2021 to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint. (See Docs. 17-21.) Defendants never responded. Plaintiffs, however, have taken no further action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiffs intend to seek a default judgment, they are directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than December 28, 2021. If Plaintiffs fail to do so or otherwise demonstrate that they do not intend to prosecute, I will dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tapia v. Super Noriega, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2021
21-CV-8778 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Tapia v. Super Noriega, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JUAN TAPIA et al. Plaintiffs, v. SUPER NORIEGA, LLC et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

21-CV-8778 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2021)