Opinion
23-cv-06159-JSC
05-17-2024
TAO HAN, Plaintiff, v. TRACY TARANGO, et al., Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Re: Dkt. No. 24
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On November 29, 2023, Plaintiff Han filed this action challenging the denial of his visa application. (Dkt. No. 1.) On April 19, 2024, the federal government filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff failed to oppose the government's motion to dismiss by the briefing deadline and, to date, has failed to respond to the government's motion. Accordingly, on or before May 24, 2024, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41. In particular, if Plaintiff wishes to oppose the government's dismissal motion, Plaintiff must file a written opposition by May 24, 2024. Failure to respond to this Order will result in a dismissal without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.