From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannert v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 22, 1941
308 Ill. App. 327 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,298. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed January 22, 1941 Rehearing denied February 5, 1941

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, § 406notice of claim, sufficiency. Verdict for plaintiff was supported by the evidence, where it appeared that plaintiff caught her toe in a depression in the sidewalk and tripped, breaking her ankle, and notice to defendant city was not defective because it gave plaintiff's residence as 4527 Drake avenue, while plaintiff actually lived at 4529, but there was no intervening property between 4525 and 4529, and inquiry would have easily disclosed plaintiff's address.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. JACOB BERKOWITZ, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in third division, first district, this court at June term, 1940.

Barnet Hodes, Corporation Counsel, for appellant;

Alexander J. Resa, Adam E. Patterson, Sydney R. Drebin, J. Herzl Segal and Louis H. Geiman, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel;

J.S. Pressman, for appellee;

David H. Kraft, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed January 22, 1941; rehearing denied February 5, 1941.


Summaries of

Tannert v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 22, 1941
308 Ill. App. 327 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
Case details for

Tannert v. City of Chicago

Case Details

Full title:Hede Tannert, Appellee, v. City of Chicago, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jan 22, 1941

Citations

308 Ill. App. 327 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
31 N.E.2d 342

Citing Cases

Renner v. City of Marysville

¶22 But in dicta, the court said that the information in a claim would be sufficient as to present and past…

Nelson v. Dunkin

We affirmed on that ground, pointing out that knowledge by the county officials of all of the circumstances…