From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. Stack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 1, 2019
176 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9982N Index 153234/18

10-01-2019

Lester J. TANNER, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Shari STACK, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Lester J. Tanner, New York, appellant pro se. Sherman Wells Sylvester & Stamelman LLP, New York (Joshua S. Bratspies of counsel), for respondents.


Lester J. Tanner, New York, appellant pro se.

Sherman Wells Sylvester & Stamelman LLP, New York (Joshua S. Bratspies of counsel), for respondents.

Friedman, J.P., Tom, Webber, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.

By the time plaintiff moved for leave to amend, the original complaint had already been dismissed; hence, "there was no complaint left before the court to amend" ( Jeffrey L. Rosenberg & Assoc. v. Kadem Capital Mgt. , 306 A.D.2d 155, 156, 763 N.Y.S.2d 541 [1st Dept. 2003] ; see generally Wadsworth Ave. Assoc. v. Maynard, 91 A.D.3d 452, 453, 935 N.Y.S.2d 880 [1st Dept. 2012] ).


Summaries of

Tanner v. Stack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 1, 2019
176 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Tanner v. Stack

Case Details

Full title:Lester J. Tanner, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shari Stack, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

176 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 7039
107 N.Y.S.3d 660

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Park

Plaintiff's subsequent motion was properly denied, since at the time plaintiff moved for leave to amend the…

Christiana Tr. v. Rice

Leave shall be freely given upon such terms as may be just" (seeFanelli v. Upstate Cerebral Palsy, Inc. , 171…