From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannenbaum v. Hoar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1966
26 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

November 21, 1966


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint after the jury could not reach a verdict and granted a new trial. Direction of a new trial is mandatory where as here the first trial resulted in a hung jury (CPLR 4113, subd. [b]). The instant order is not an appealable order under CPLR 5701 (subd. [a]). ( Aesman v. Fox, 26 A.D.2d 739; Covell v. H.R.H. Constr. Corp., 24 A.D.2d 566, affd. 17 N.Y.2d 709). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tannenbaum v. Hoar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1966
26 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Tannenbaum v. Hoar

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS TANNENBAUM, Respondent, v. EDWIN E. HOAR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Totaro v. Scarlatos

Since evidence of the injured plaintiffs injuries was relevant to the issue of whether the defendant acted in…

State v. Exxon Corp.

We agree with plaintiff that on this record Supreme Court erred in purporting to grant a directed verdict in…