From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tann v. Herlands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 6, 1996
224 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 6, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


As plaintiff concedes, the order granting him partial summary judgment was erroneous. Notwithstanding the fact that defendants' vehicle struck plaintiff's in a rear-end collision, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiff's operation of his vehicle caused or contributed to the accident ( see, Migdol v Striker, 215 A.D.2d 358). Additionally, defendants' liability should be considered and determined simultaneously with the material, and overlapping, issue of whether the plaintiff was also culpable ( see, Enker v. Slattery Constr. Co., 34 A.D.2d 673).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Tann v. Herlands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 6, 1996
224 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Tann v. Herlands

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN TANN, Respondent, v. DAVID HERLANDS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 293

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. City of New York

We have followed that guidance repeatedly since Thoma was decided. For example, in Tann v Herlands (224 AD2d…

Maniscalco v. New York City Transit Auth.

It does not avail the dissent to defend its position on the ground that, to win summary judgment as to…