From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanck v. Tanck

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 1996
675 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2468.

July 3, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Frank L. Bell, Judge.

Louis K. Rosenbloum and David H. Levin of Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for appellant.

Laura E. Keene of Beroset Keene, Pensacola, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's determination in all respects but one. Based on the disparity of the incomes and financial positions of the parties, we determine that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to order the husband to pay 100 percent of the wife's attorney's fees and costs. We, therefore, reverse that portion of the final judgment, and direct that the husband be required to pay all of the wife's attorney's fees and costs.

We also would again remind the trial court that it is inappropriate for the trial court to chastise and doggedly question a party as to issues adequately addressed on cross-examination. See Nicholson v. Nicholson, 671 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tanck v. Tanck

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 1996
675 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Tanck v. Tanck

Case Details

Full title:GLENDA HARRIS TANCK, APPELLANT, v. JAMES ROBERT TANCK, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 3, 1996

Citations

675 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Rossi v. Garner

The appealed order is affirmed except as to the requirement that the appellee pay only a portion of the…

Mowe v. Mowe

We affirm the distribution of property and the alimony award. Because the former husband's income is…