From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tampueco v. Am. Airlines

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2023
23-cv-00081-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00081-JST

02-22-2023

EDGAR TAMPUECO, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge.

On February 7, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff “to show cause as to why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to file a timely opposition” to Defendant's motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff's response to the order to show cause was due by February 21, 2023. Id. The Court advised that “[f]ailure to file a response by that date will result in dismissal of the complaint under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” Id.

Plaintiff has failed to file the required response. Accordingly, this case is dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dismissal is without prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tampueco v. Am. Airlines

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2023
23-cv-00081-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Tampueco v. Am. Airlines

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR TAMPUECO, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00081-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)