From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Dec 19, 2017
58 Misc. 3d 137 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2015–1268 K C

12-19-2017

TAM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP., as Assignee of Bah, Ousmane, Respondent, v. MVAIC, Appellant.

Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Naim M. Peress, Esq.), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for respondent.


Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Naim M. Peress, Esq.), for appellant.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

"The filing of a timely affidavit providing the MVAIC with notice of intention to file a claim is a condition precedent to the right to apply for payment from [MVAIC]'. Compliance with the statutory requirement of timely filing a notice of claim must be established in order to demonstrate that the claimant is a covered person,' within the meaning of the statute, entitled to recover no-fault benefits from the MVAIC" ( Avicenna Med. Arts, P.L.L.C. v. MVAIC , 53 Misc 3d 142[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51535[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2016] [citations omitted]; see Insurance Law §§ 5208 [a] [1], [3]; 5221 [b] [2] ). Defendant established that it had not received such an affidavit.

Accordingly, the order is reversed, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Dec 19, 2017
58 Misc. 3d 137 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

TAM Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC

Case Details

Full title:TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Bah, Ousmane, Respondent, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Dec 19, 2017

Citations

58 Misc. 3d 137 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 51831
92 N.Y.S.3d 705

Citing Cases

Advanced Recovery E. v. Mvaic

Indem. Corp. , 167 AD3d at 895 ; Optimal Well-Being Chiropractic, P.C. v MVAIC , 41 Misc 3d 131[A], 2013 NY…

Advanced Recovery E. & S. v. MVAIC

ot reported within twenty-four hours after the occurrence as required by subparagraph (A) hereof shall not…