From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taliaferro v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 147 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81507

March 18, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Colleen Dolan, Judge.

Douglas R. Hoff, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


Movant, Antonio Taliaferro, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he pleaded guilty involuntarily due to his plea attorney's false promise that the trial court would grant him probation.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Taliaferro v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 147 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Taliaferro v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO TALIAFERRO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 18, 2003

Citations

100 S.W.3d 147 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)