From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Nov 30, 1932
127 Cal.App. 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 8792.

November 30, 1932.

MOTION to Dismiss an appeal or to affirm judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. D.M. Burnett, Judge. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Hugh Martin Young, Charles D. Warner and Thomas W. Hughes for Appellant.

Edward M. Fellows for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] Under the authority of section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, respondent moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal was taken for delay only and that the questions on which the decision of the case depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. After examining the transcript on appeal in connection with the points made in appellant's brief it is our opinion that the appeal presents a debatable question of law, and therefore the motion is denied.

Thompson (R.L.), J., and Plummer, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Nov 30, 1932
127 Cal.App. 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association

Case Details

Full title:TOSHI TAKETA, Respondent, v. POLICY HOLDERS LIFE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION (a…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Nov 30, 1932

Citations

127 Cal.App. 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
16 P.2d 312

Citing Cases

Runkle v. Lane

Therefore, the motion to dismiss or affirm is denied. ( Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn., 127…