From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taj v. Highlander Cmty. Servs. & Inv., LLC

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 27, 2019
No. 05-19-00369-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-00369-CV

08-27-2019

SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBEDA TAJ, Appellants v. HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INVESTMENT, LLC, Appellee


On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-02669-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell
Opinion by Justice Nowell

This is an appeal from the trial court's March 21, 2019 order denying appellant's request for a temporary injunction. By notice filed August 15, 2019, appellee has informed the Court that a final judgment has been signed and prays the case be dismissed. Attached to the notice is the judgment, which has also been included in a supplemental clerk's record. We construe the notice as a motion to dismiss and grant the motion.

The signing of a final judgment while an appeal of an order granting or denying a temporary injunction is pending moots the appeal. See Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Grp., P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam). When an appeal from the denial of a temporary injunction becomes moot because a final judgment has been signed, we must set aside all previous trial court orders concerning the requested temporary injunction and dismiss the case. See id. (citing Tex. Foundries, Inc. v. Int'l Moulders & Foundry Workers' Union, 248 S.W.2d 460, 461 (Tex. 1952).

More than ten days have passed since appellee's motion was filed, and appellants have not responded to the motion. Because the trial court has signed a final judgment and nothing before us reflects the appeal is not moot, we grant the motion, set aside the trial court's order denying the request for a temporary injunction, and dismiss the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Isuani, 802 S.W.2d at 236.

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE 190369F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-02669-2018.
Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, Chief Justice Burns and Justice Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, we SET ASIDE the trial court's order denying the request for temporary injunction and DISMISS the case.

We ORDER that appellee Highlander Community Services and Investment, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Satfraz Taj and Zubeda Taj. Judgment entered this 27th day of August, 2019.


Summaries of

Taj v. Highlander Cmty. Servs. & Inv., LLC

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 27, 2019
No. 05-19-00369-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2019)
Case details for

Taj v. Highlander Cmty. Servs. & Inv., LLC

Case Details

Full title:SATFRAZ TAJ AND ZUBEDA TAJ, Appellants v. HIGHLANDER COMMUNITY SERVICES…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Aug 27, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-00369-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2019)