From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tait v. Neven

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 12, 2012
381 P.3d 668 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 61086.

12-12-2012

Richard TAIT, Appellant, v. Dwight NEVEN, Warden, Respondent.

Richard Tait Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Clark County District Attorney


Richard Tait

Attorney General/Carson City

Attorney General/Las Vegas

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See

In his petition filed on April 12, 2012, appellant challenged the imposition of restitution as the result of prison disciplinary proceedings. Notably, appellant was never referred for the loss of credits, and the record indicates that no credits were forfeited. Because appellant did not lose any credits, appellant's claims challenging the prison disciplinary proceedings were not cognizable in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in state court because these claims challenged the conditions of confinement. Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 686 P.2d 250 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911(1975).


Summaries of

Tait v. Neven

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 12, 2012
381 P.3d 668 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Tait v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:Richard TAIT, Appellant, v. Dwight NEVEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 668 (Nev. 2012)