From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tacoma v. Heinricy

The Supreme Court of Washington
May 24, 1937
68 P.2d 1031 (Wash. 1937)

Opinion

No. 26524. Department One.

May 24, 1937.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Remann, J., entered October 24, 1936, upon a trial and conviction of obstructing a public thoroughfare. Affirmed.

P.L. Pendleton and W.G. Palmer, for appellant.

Howard Carothers, Bartlett Rummel, and George F. Abel, for respondent.


The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P.2d 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Tacoma v. Heinricy

The Supreme Court of Washington
May 24, 1937
68 P.2d 1031 (Wash. 1937)
Case details for

Tacoma v. Heinricy

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. ED HEINRICY, Appellant

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: May 24, 1937

Citations

68 P.2d 1031 (Wash. 1937)
68 P.2d 1031
190 Wash. 710