From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tacoma v. Currington

The Supreme Court of Washington
May 24, 1937
68 P.2d 1030 (Wash. 1937)

Opinion

No. 26521. Department One.

May 24, 1937.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered October 22, 1936, upon a trial and conviction of obstructing a public thoroughfare. Affirmed.

P.L. Pendleton, for appellant.

Howard Carothers, Bartlett Rummel, and George F. Abel, for respondent.


Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in the case of Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P.2d 1028. The facts in this case bring the case within the rule laid down in that case.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Tacoma v. Currington

The Supreme Court of Washington
May 24, 1937
68 P.2d 1030 (Wash. 1937)
Case details for

Tacoma v. Currington

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. GEORGE CURRINGTON, Appellant

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: May 24, 1937

Citations

68 P.2d 1030 (Wash. 1937)
190 Wash. 709
190 Wn. 709