From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taccino v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 28, 2018
No. 18-1294 (4th Cir. Jun. 28, 2018)

Summary

affirming "for the reasons stated by the district court"

Summary of this case from Darien L. v. Saul

Opinion

No. 18-1294 No. 18-1295

06-28-2018

WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants - Appellees. WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U. S. A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants - Appellees.

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02112-GLR) Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Anthony Taccino appeals the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and upholding the Commissioner's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Comm'r Soc. Sec., No. 1:14-cv-02112-GLR (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018; Feb. 23, 2018). We deny Taccino's motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Taccino v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 28, 2018
No. 18-1294 (4th Cir. Jun. 28, 2018)

affirming "for the reasons stated by the district court"

Summary of this case from Darien L. v. Saul
Case details for

Taccino v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ORGANIZING FOR ACTION…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 28, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1294 (4th Cir. Jun. 28, 2018)

Citing Cases

Darien L. v. Saul

Taccino v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., Civil Case No. GLR-14-2112, 2017 WL 6275916, at *1 (D. Md. Dec. 11,…