From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taccino v. Morrisey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 3, 2017
No. 17-1507 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1507

10-03-2017

WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK MORRISEY; SUE ROBEY; J. COURRIER; JOE E. MILLER; JAMES DAVIS; TROOPER JOHN DROPPLEMAN; NELSON MICHAEL; MICHAEL SHAY; KEITH BRADSHAW; BRIDGET COHEE; TRACEY B. EBERLING; JASON P. FOSTER; RALPH BRADY, Defendants - Appellees.

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT) Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Morrisey, No. 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Taccino v. Morrisey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 3, 2017
No. 17-1507 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Taccino v. Morrisey

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK MORRISEY; SUE ROBEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 3, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1507 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2017)