Consequently, the fourth numbered requirement above, a final decision, is not satisfied. See In re Bosque, No. 10-62444, 2013 WL 795243, at *4 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013) (denying preclusive effect to a default judgment where there was no showing that the judgment was entered by any judge or that it became a final judgment, citing Ferraro).
Accordingly, no final judgment with preclusive effect has been entered in the ETS Action. See Taa v. Bosque (In re Bosque), No. 10-62444 (ASW), 2013 WL 795243, at *4 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013) (refusing to give preclusive effect to purported default judgment where "there [wa]s nothing showing that a default judgment was entered by any judge, or that the default judgment became a final judgment"). C. The Amended Claim Fails to State a Claim for Relief