From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Szanto v. United States (In re Szanto)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-00322-RCJ (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-00322-RCJ Bankr. No. 13-bk-51261-BTB

07-23-2014

In re PETER SZANTO, Debtor. PETER SZANTO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff-Debtor Peter Szanto has asked the Court to withdraw the reference of his Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in its entirety based upon the alleged bias of the bankruptcy judge. The Court has reviewed the docket in the underlying bankruptcy case and noticed that: (1) the bankruptcy case was dismissed on June 17, 2014; (2) the present motion to withdraw the reference was filed on June 18, 2014; and (3) a notice of appeal was filed on June 19, 2014. The Court denies the motion to withdraw the reference of the bankruptcy case because the motion was filed after the bankruptcy case was dismissed. See, e.g., In re Lear Corp., 418 B.R. 47, 48 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (dismissing a motion to withdraw the reference as moot where the bankruptcy court had dismissed the relevant adversary proceeding while the motion was pending).

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw the Reference (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Szanto v. United States (In re Szanto)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-00322-RCJ (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Szanto v. United States (In re Szanto)

Case Details

Full title:In re PETER SZANTO, Debtor. PETER SZANTO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 23, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-00322-RCJ (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)