From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Szabo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2014
Case No. 3:13 CV 2485 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13 CV 2485

07-31-2014

Mike Gerald Szabo, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed July 11, 2014 (Doc. 17). The R&R recommends this Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Plaintiff's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no request for an extension has been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court affirms the final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jack Zouhary

JACK ZOUHARY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

July 31, 2014


Summaries of

Szabo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2014
Case No. 3:13 CV 2485 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Szabo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Mike Gerald Szabo, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13 CV 2485 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Nothing in SSR 82-59 restricted the ALJ's ability to consider the impact plaintiff's noncompliance had on her…