From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. TriZetto Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 30, 2020
15 Civ. 211 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2020)

Opinion

15 Civ. 211 (LGS)

09-30-2020

SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES MAURITIUS LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v. THE TRIZETTO GROUP., et al., Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs.


ORDER
(Plaintiffs' MIL 12) :

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited and Syntel, Inc. (together, "Syntel") move in limine (Dkt. No. 712) to preclude Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs The TriZetto Group, Inc. and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. ("Defendants") from offering any evidence regarding certificates of registration and deposit copies for copyrighted works, other than for Facets version 5.10, best practices in ICD-10 configuration and Facets Roadmap Review, because they are irrelevant and unduly prejudicial, pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402 and 403.

To the extent that the motion seeks to preclude as exhibits the certificates of registration or deposit copies for works other than those on which TriZetto has sued, the motion is denied as moot because Defendants have agreed not to offer these documents into evidence at trial.

Defendants seek to introduce testimony that TriZetto has copyrights in versions of the Facets software that preceded the version at issue here. Defendants may elicit testimony about copyrights in prior versions to provide background about the copyrighted works at issue, including to show circumstantially that Data Dictionary is a part of Facets 5.10 or a derivative work thereof. The testimony is probative of Defendants copyright infringement counterclaim, and the fact that Syntel disputes the inference that Defendants suggest does not make the evidence unfairly prejudicial. Syntel may cross-examine and argue to challenge that inference.

For these reasons, it is ORDERED that Syntel's motion in limine No. 12 is DENIED. Defendants may elicit testimony regarding copyrights in prior versions of the Facet software to provide background about the copyrighted works at issue here.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket No. 712. Dated: September 30, 2020

New York, New York

/s/ _________

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. TriZetto Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 30, 2020
15 Civ. 211 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. TriZetto Grp.

Case Details

Full title:SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES MAURITIUS LIMITED, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 30, 2020

Citations

15 Civ. 211 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2020)