Opinion
2012-1522
03-12-2013
IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, v. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC., MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH, INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC., Defendants.
RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN. KENNETH W. BROTHERS, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were GARY M. HOFFMAN; and KRISTA M. CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H. RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge James Ware.
JUDGMENT
RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN.
KENNETH W. BROTHERS, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were GARY M. HOFFMAN; and KRISTA M. CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H. RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and Dyk, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
______________________
Jan Horbaly
Clerk