Synopsys, Inc. v. Ricoh Co. (In re Ricoh Co., Ltd. Patent Litig.)

Full title: IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION SYNOPSYS, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

505 F. App'x 954 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1522

03-12-2013

IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, v. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC., MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH, INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC., Defendants.

RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN. KENNETH W. BROTHERS, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were GARY M. HOFFMAN; and KRISTA M. CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H. RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California.

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge James Ware.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN.

KENNETH W. BROTHERS, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were GARY M. HOFFMAN; and KRISTA M. CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H. RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and Dyk, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk