From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sylacauga Lodge, v. McGhee

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 8, 1919
81 So. 689 (Ala. Crim. App. 1919)

Opinion

7 Div. 530.

April 8, 1919.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County; Lum Duke, Judge.

Action by Sylacauga Lodge, No. 200, F. A. M., against Perry McGhee. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

R. Williams, of Sylacauga, for appellant.

Luther L. Saxon, of Columbiana, for appellee.


The evidence offered by the plaintiff conclusively shows that the property sought to be recovered by this action had never been in its possession, but was adversely claimed and held by the defendant at the time the deed by the Sylacauga Fraternal Hall Association to appellant was executed and delivered. Therefore, aside from the question as to whether the description in the deed was sufficient to embrace the property in suit, the sale and conveyance as to the property so adversely held is void, and the plaintiff, relying on this conveyance, was not entitled to recover, and the court properly rendered judgment for the defendant. Ala. State Bank v. Barnes, 82 Ala. 607, 2 So. 349; Foy v. Cochran, 88 Ala. 353, 6 So. 685; Billingsley v. Harrell, 11 Ala. 775; Rust v. Elect. Supply Co., 124 Ala. 202, 27 So. 263.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sylacauga Lodge, v. McGhee

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 8, 1919
81 So. 689 (Ala. Crim. App. 1919)
Case details for

Sylacauga Lodge, v. McGhee

Case Details

Full title:SYLACAUGA LODGE, NO. 200, F. A. M., v. McGHEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 8, 1919

Citations

81 So. 689 (Ala. Crim. App. 1919)
17 Ala. App. 52

Citing Cases

Sanders v. Gernert Bros. Lumber Co.

The evidence is also without dispute that the plaintiff did not surrender or offer to surrender to the…

Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Isbell Nat. Bank

The legal effect of these averments, as the court held, was that the money so in the bank's possession was…