From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swopes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov 25, 2014
447 S.W.3d 740 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100081.

2014-11-25

Laron SWOPES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael David, Judge. Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael David, Judge.
Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, C.J., LISA J. VAN AMBURG, J., GLORIA CLARK RENO, S.J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Laron Swopes (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion as his trial counsel was ineffective during the penalty phase for failing to object to: (1) inadmissible testimony that other members of a gang Movant associated with had been arrested for various crimes; and (2) improper argument by the prosecutor during penalty-phase closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Swopes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov 25, 2014
447 S.W.3d 740 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Swopes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Laron SWOPES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

447 S.W.3d 740 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)