From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Switzer v. Dean

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2013
515 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-2455

03-28-2013

THOMAS L. SWITZER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean, Defendant - Appellee, and TOWN OF STANLEY; MAYOR DOUG PURDHAM; OFFICER BROWN; MARK BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff; DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL, Defendants.

Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, TAYLOR ZUNKA MILNOR & CARTER, LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW) Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, TAYLOR ZUNKA MILNOR & CARTER, LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court's order denying his motion for transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Sergeant Dean, No. 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Switzer v. Dean

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2013
515 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Switzer v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS L. SWITZER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

515 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2013)