From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swint v. Stone

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 2, 2021
21-CV-5828 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-5828 (LTS)

09-02-2021

ROBERT JAMES SWINT, Plaintiff, v. ROGERT JASON STONE; DONALD JOHN TRUMP; NEW YORK TIMES; LA TIMES; UPI NEWS, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated July 15, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to either pay the $402.00 in fees that are required to file a civil action in this court or submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”). On July 29, 2021, the order was returned to the Court with a notation on the envelope indicating that the mail was undeliverable to that address. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order, has failed to notify the Court of a change of mailing address, and has not initiated any further contact with the Court, written or otherwise. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Swint v. Stone

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 2, 2021
21-CV-5828 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Swint v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT JAMES SWINT, Plaintiff, v. ROGERT JASON STONE; DONALD JOHN TRUMP…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2021

Citations

21-CV-5828 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2021)