From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swinney v. Tenth Dist. Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of Texas
May 11, 1988
749 S.W.2d 50 (Tex. 1988)

Opinion

No. C-7388.

May 11, 1988.

Bertran T. Bader, III, Cox Bader, Dallas, for relator.

Michael A. Hummert, Bracken Hummert, Cowan and Tunks, Dallas, for respondent.


ORIGINAL MANDAMUS PROCEEDING ORDER


Relator's petition for writ of mandamus was submitted to the Supreme Court of Texas on the eleventh day of May, 1988, and it is the opinion of the court, through a majority of its members, that relator is entitled to relief.

The order of the Tenth District Court of Appeals denying relator's Motion to Increase Supersedeas is in conflict with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 47(b) and 49(a). Therefore, without hearing oral argument and pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 122, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally granted as follows:

(1) The Tenth District Court of Appeals is hereby ordered to vacate its order in Cause No. 10-88-007-CV dated March 31, 1988 denying relator's Motion to Increase Supersedeas Bond; and

(2) The Tenth District Court of Appeals is hereby ordered to require appellants in Cause No. 10-88-007-CV to file an amended supersedeas bond with the amount of the bond described as $565,391.98 plus interest accruing thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum from the date of the judgment until final disposition of the cause on appeal.

Other relief requested is denied. This writ will issue only if respondent fails to comply with this order.


Summaries of

Swinney v. Tenth Dist. Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of Texas
May 11, 1988
749 S.W.2d 50 (Tex. 1988)
Case details for

Swinney v. Tenth Dist. Court of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:John O. SWINNEY, Jr., Relator, v. The TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: May 11, 1988

Citations

749 S.W.2d 50 (Tex. 1988)