From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swinney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 2000
757 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-4808..

Opinion filed March 24, 2000. Rehearing denied April 28, 2000.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P.9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge.


James Ronald Swinney appeals the dismissal of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm.

Any complaint Swinney may have about how the Department of Corrections interprets his sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by petition for writ of mandamus filed in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Swinney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 2000
757 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Swinney v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RONALD SWINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 24, 2000

Citations

757 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. State

See Edward v. State, 966 So.2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Furthermore, the claim is not cognizable in a…

Brown v. State

A claim that the DOC has incorrectly interpreted a sentence is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See…