From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct 2, 2012
380 S.W.3d 651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97898.

2012-10-2

Mark Thomas SWIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Daniel G. Pelikan, Judge. Amanda P. Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Daniel G. Pelikan, Judge.
Amanda P. Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER

Mark T. Swier appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Swier's request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Swier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct 2, 2012
380 S.W.3d 651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Swier v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark Thomas SWIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

380 S.W.3d 651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)