From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swiech v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 30, 2009
5:06-CV-0342 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

5:06-CV-0342 (LEK/VEB).

March 30, 2009


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on March 5, 2009, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 13).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the matter is REMANDED for further consideration; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Swiech v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 30, 2009
5:06-CV-0342 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Swiech v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CATHLEEN SWIECH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

5:06-CV-0342 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)