From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeting v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 13, 2021
317 So. 3d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D20-1616

05-13-2021

Samuel C. SWEETING, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Samuel C. Sweeting, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Omar J. Famada, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Samuel C. Sweeting, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Omar J. Famada, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Kelsey, Jay, and Nordby, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Sweeting v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 13, 2021
317 So. 3d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Sweeting v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL C. SWEETING, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 13, 2021

Citations

317 So. 3d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)