From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweet v. B.B. Stores

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 12, 1952
108 N.E.2d 737 (Ohio 1952)

Opinion

No. 33054

Decided November 12, 1952.

Negligence — Storekeepers — Not liable to patron slipping on floor, when — Insufficient evidence to warrant recovery — Directed verdict not error.

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff when she slipped on spinach on the floor of defendant company's grocery store while she was a customer therein. There is no evidence as to how the spinach came to be on the floor or as to how long it had been there. The accident occurred in a separate grocery department 30 or 40 feet from the department in which spinach was sold.

At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the trial court sustained defendants' motions for a directed verdict in their favor and rendered judgment for them. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals and the record of the case was certified as a conflict case to this court for review.

Messrs. Herbert Dombey and Mr. Russell E. Leasure, for appellant.

Messrs. Wright, Harlor, Purpus, Morris Arnold, for appellee Big Bear Stores Company.

Mr. Luther L. Boger, for appellee Forrest R. Sparks.


The judgment is affirmed on authority of Hardgrove v. Isaly Dairy Co., 139 Ohio St. 641, 41 N.E.2d 862; Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co., 141 Ohio St. 584, 49 N.E.2d 925; Boles v. Montgomery Ward Co., 153 Ohio St. 381, 92 N.E.2d 9.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

MIDDLETON, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Sweet v. B.B. Stores

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 12, 1952
108 N.E.2d 737 (Ohio 1952)
Case details for

Sweet v. B.B. Stores

Case Details

Full title:SWEET, APPELLANT v. BIG BEAR STORES CO. ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 12, 1952

Citations

108 N.E.2d 737 (Ohio 1952)
108 N.E.2d 737

Citing Cases

Schon v. National Tea Co.

Where there is no evidence as to the length of time a slippery substance dropped on a floor of a grocery…

Titenok v. Wal-Mart Stores E., Inc.

Mere speculation or conjecture is insufficient as a matter of law to constitute proof that appellee committed…