From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweat v. Attorney Gen.

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Nov 22, 2022
Civ. 19-987 JB/GJF (D.N.M. Nov. 22, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 19-987 JB/GJF

11-22-2022

ALREE B. SWEAT, III, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondent.


ORDER SETTING REPLY DEADLINE

HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITED/STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

In their answer to Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Respondents assert that the petition should be dismissed with prejudice, and a certificate of appealability denied, because “[Petitioner] fails to identify any state-court merits adjudication that was (1) contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law[ ] or (2) based upon an unreasonable determination” of facts given the evidentiary record. ECF 19 at 1. Pursuant to Rule 5(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Petitioner as “the moving party[,] may file a reply to the respondent's answer” and the Court “must set the time to file [such a reply] unless the time is already set by local rule.”

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner has until December 21, 2022, to file a reply to Respondent's answer [ECF 19].

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sweat v. Attorney Gen.

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Nov 22, 2022
Civ. 19-987 JB/GJF (D.N.M. Nov. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Sweat v. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:ALREE B. SWEAT, III, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

Civ. 19-987 JB/GJF (D.N.M. Nov. 22, 2022)